Manuka Honey UMF, MGO, KFactor

Manuka is a precious honey with many therapeutic benefits. The honey owes its growing popularity to its strong antibacterial properties that have turned it into a natural remedy for a wide range of conditions. However, not all manuka honey is the same. Honey produced in the same season and from the same region may vary incredibly in terms of its content of antibacterial elements and, as a result, medicinal value. This has lead to the development of several grading systems such as UMF, MGO or KFactor that measure the properties of the honey.

What are the grading systems for manuka honey? There are numerous ways of grading manuka honey, but not all systems are trustworthy. The only certified grading systems of manuka honey are UMF, MGO and KFactor. Each of the three measures the properties of the honey differently, the ultimate goal being to evaluate or estimate the therapeutic value of the honey for the end consumer. Choosing certified honey brands is just as important as knowing what the letters and numbers on the label mean so here is everything you should known about manuka honey grading systems.

Manuka honey grading systems

What does manuka honey UMF mean? UMF stands for Unique Manuka Factor which refers to the element in manuka honey that makes it unique and superior to all other honeys. This element is the antibacterial compound called methylglyoxal, the principal active ingredient responsible for most of the health benefits of manuka honey. At the time the honey started to gain popularity there was little known about its composition. So the therapeutic effects it was famous for were presumed to be the result of a compound unique to manuka alone, but because it was not yet identified at the time, it was called the unique manuka factor, UMF for short.

UMF is also a registered quality trademark of the Unique Manuka Factor Honey Association from New Zealand, formerly known as the Active Manuka Honey Association. The association has coined the term (it owns it) and licenses it to producers and beekeepers that meet the strict UMF quality trademark regulations. Honeys are subjected to standardized testing to verify their quality and confirm their UMF status, but the association also performs random tests on various samples already available on the market to ensure only the highest quality honey bears their label.

It is currently one of the most popular and trustworthy certifications for manuka honey that offers the guarantee of a healthy, pure and safe product. At the same time, it is the only international certification for the honey. There are currently about 100 licensed producers under the UMF Honey Association. Because not all manuka honey is the same, the grading system ranges as follows:

(UMF5+) (UMF8+) The honeys rated UMF5+ and UMF8+ have a minimum antibacterial activity and low overall therapeutic value.
(UMF10+) (UMF12+) Have a medium antibacterial activity and therapeutic value.
(UMF15+) (UMF16+) (UMF18+) Manuka honeys UMF15+, 16+ and 18+ are considered to have a high therapeutic value.
(UMF20+) (UMF25+) Manuka honeys graded UMF20+ and UMF25+ exhibit the strongest antibacterial action and boast the highest therapeutic value the UMF grading system measures.

Manuka honey UMF and MGO grading

What does manuka honey MGO mean? MGO (or MG) stands for methylglyoxal which is the main biologically active antibacterial element in manuka honeys, responsible for their excellent health benefits. MGO is basically the unique manuka factor, the element that makes this particular honey superior to all others. At the same time, it is an internationally recognized grading system for manuka honey established by Professor Peter Charles Molan from the University of Waikato, New Zealand.

Professor Molan (top left picture) identified the unique properties of manuka and set to establish a standardized model for measuring these properties and their therapeutic value. Thanks to the research conducted by Professor Thomas Henle (top right picture) from the University of Dresden, Germany, the unique manuka factor would soon be identified as methylglyoxal, or MGO. Methylglyoxal is different from the glucose oxidase enzyme that forms the antibacterial hydrogen peroxide in other honeys, hence the reason the antibacterial activity of manuka honey is also known as non-peroxide activity (because its main biologically active antimicrobial component is not peroxide-based).

The identification of the mysterious element allowed for its measurement in the harvested honey and lead to the establishment of an efficient standardized grading system known as MGO. As a grading system, MGO measures the content of methylglyoxal in manuka honeys and serves as certification for the quality and purity of the honey.  The MGO grading system measures the antibacterial content of methylglyoxal per kg of manuka honey with great scientific precision.

The reference point for the MGO grading system is 100 mg of methylglyoxal/ kg of manuka honey. Why this particular amount? Because, as Professor Thomas Henle revealed from his research, this is the minimum amount of methylglyoxal that can effectively inhibit the the growth of bacteria such as pathogenic E. coli bacteria. Less than 100 mg/ kg is believed to hold insignificant therapeutic value. Methylglyoxal content in manuka may range from about 30 mg/kg to as much as 1,000 mg/kg. The grading system lists the following values for MGO in manuka honey:

MGO30+ (contains 30 mg of methylglyoxal/ kg of manuka honey)
MGO100+ (contains 100 mg of methylglyoxal/ kg of manuka honey)
MGO250+ (250 mg/kg)
MGO400+ (400 mg/kg)
MGO550+ (550 mg/kg)

Is MGO content stable?┬áManuka honey has been found to increase its content of methylglyoxal with time. Research shows the simple carbohydrate or sugar DHA converts into the antibacterial element methylglyoxal, significantly increasing the initial MGO content of the honey and the honey’s antibacterial and overall therapeutic value. After about 4 years, the MGO content begins to decrease (Processing and Impact on Active Components in Food).

Manuka honey properties

Equivalating UMF and MGO. How do we compare the different grading systems of manuka? According to Comvita New Zealand, the UMF and MGO ratings can be equivalated as follows:

UMF 5+ is equivalent to MGO 83+ (meaning a minimum of 83 mg of methylglyoxal/ kg of manuka honey)
UMF 10+ is equivalent to MGO 263+
UMF 15+ is equivalent to MGO 514+
UMF 20+ is equivalent to MGO 829+
UMF 22+ is equivalent to MGO 971+

What is manuka honey MGS? The Molan Gold Standard is a trademark grading system and certification invented by Professor Peter Charles Molan. MGS not only measures the amount of the antibacterial methylglyoxal in manuka honey, but also certifies the purity of the honey. According to the Molan Gold Standard, the following values can be taken as reference:

MGS 5+ Manuka honey (has a minimum of 100 mg of methylglyoxal/ kg of manuka honey)
MGS 8+ (200 mg/kg)
MGS 10+ (300 mg/kg)
MGS 12+ (400 mg/kg)
MGS 15+ (500 mg/kg)
MGS 16+ (600 mg/kg)
MGS 18+ (700 mg/kg)
MGS 20+ (800 mg/kg)

What does manuka honey KFactor mean? KFactor is a grading system that measures the content of manuka pollen in manuka honey. The idea is that the more manuka pollen the honey contain, the higher its purity and, naturally, the stronger its therapeutic effects. The grading system goes from K12 (with a minimum of about 65% manuka pollen) to K16 (75% manuka pollen) and K22 (90% manuka pollen). However, it is reportedly difficult to distinguish between manuka pollen, kanuka pollen or the pollen of related species, hence the reason why this particular system is not particularly appreciated.

difference mgo mgs umf

Are there any other reliable grading systems? Other grading systems for manuka honey may include BioActive, TA or A, NPA (non-peroxide activity) or various systems with numbers of letters. Such systems do not offer any real guarantee of the quality, safety, purity or therapeutic action of the honey. When it comes to manuka, it is important to always choose certified brands, not obscure grading systems.

Just as important, make sure the label is correctly written. A correctly labeled manuka honey should include the trademark certification, be it UMF, MGO or MGS, followed by the number representing the value it measures and the plus sign indicating the fact that it is a minimum measured value. Examples of correct labels: UMF 15+, MGO 550+, MGS 20+ and so on. And remember, values as low as UMF 5+, UMF 8+, MGO 30+, MGO 83+, MGS 5+ mean it is no better than a regular honey. Higher number values like UMF 15+, UMF 20+, MGO 550+ etc. are more of a guarantee of the health benefits of manuka honey.


Many grading systems for manuka honey have been established over the years, but few have reached a level of standardization and accuracy that would allow them to be used to certify the purity or quality of this special honey. The most trustworthy grading systems we should look for on the label are the Unique manuka factor (UMF), methylglyoxal measurement (MGO) and the Molan gold standard (MGS). Just as important as getting certified honey is making sure the honey is correctly labeled, so check the origin of your honey, its label and what the values written on said label mean to make sure the honey delivers the therapeutic effects you are looking for.

This post was updated on Tuesday / July 28th, 2020 at 10:52 PM

8 thoughts on “Manuka Honey UMF, MGO, KFactor”

  1. Additional comments: since Wedderspoon claims to perform extensive research, obviously they must have run tests to determine umf values of their products. It is quite possible that their findings for their product is below the desired value, therefore they chose not to disclose umf values on their product label. Advising consumers that their product contains x and y amounts of manuka pollen is meaningless. I am upset since I felt deceived by their product, especially after doing product research on-line.

    • Hello, Ashma. In what way did you feel deceived? Is it because UMF values are not listed, or did the honey not provide the benefits you were expecting? From what I understand, KFactor is a valid certification in compliance with New Zealand Food Legislation. And since it measures pollen count, it is a certification of quality that guarantees a certain manuka pollen count in the honey and, I assume, honey purity, especially considering they state the pollen is naturally occurring, not added. For example, KFactor 22 manuka honey providing 90% manuka pollen is, well, a certification of authenticity based on the grading system. Their honey is also natural, raw and unprocessed as well as organic, so it could actually be a good honey with a decent unique manuka factor content. To my knowledge, this particular grading system of manuka honey belongs to them and having created the KFactor themselves, I have always assumed it was supposed to make their honey stand out by having a novel grading system. I have never thought about it the other way around. Especially since pollen is an important source of health benefits too, particularly benefits for the immune system. I have only tried manuka with UMF and MGO grading systems so far and have been happy with it, so I am genuinely curious to learn more about your dissatisfaction. Eager to hear from you again.

  2. After reviewing the comparison on this and many websites, the kfactor only measures the level of manuka pollen, period. The kfactor does not provide any therapeutic data, whereas the umf values provide these data. Additionally, not all manuka honeys are the same. Furthermore, I believe their umf must be fairly low, otherwise they would have published it. I will continue to purchase the manuka honey with umf rating and vowing never to waste my money on something that in my particular case did not provide the benefit I was looking for.

    • Thank you for your reply, Ashma. Indeed, when one looks to get manuka honey, one seeks its unique properties and a certain guarantee of those properties. Because it’s the benefits of manuka honey that make it such a popular product, although the flavor adds to its appeal too. I for one am eager to see where they will take the KFactor grading system because it says they are looking to expand it to include other properties of manuka honey that make it what it is. Who knows, maybe this will include unique manuka factor values. How exciting would it be if there was a correlation between pollen content and unique manuka factor. But I have to agree with you on this: if you are looking for a certain benefit, then you should go for the honey that promises and delivers that benefit. Wishing you lots of health.

  3. ‘As a result of the high premium paid for manuka honey, an increasing number of products now labelled as such worldwide are counterfeit or adulterated. According to research by UMFHA, the main trade association of New Zealand manuka honey producers, whereas 1,700 tons of manuka honey are made there annually representing almost all the world’s production, some 10,000 tons of produce is being sold internationally as manuka honey, including 1,800 tons in the UK’. (end of citation)
    This was taken from the Wikipedia article about Manuka honey. It says it all. Practically 8,300 TONS of Manuka honey sold while only 1,700 tons produced = 8,300 tons of fake Manuka honey.
    Yes, health is a big market and there will always be people who profit from that in a unethical way. I would only trust UMF or MGO/MGS certifications hoping that I get the true product. Private laboratories and company-own testing does not convince me enough and is like making the fox the guardian of the hen house. Everybody can come up with their own testing method. The honey of the named company is available in practically every supermarket for an unreal low price and online which keeps me looking at the 8,300 tons above and as I read also, their honey was found substandard in earlier testing.

    • You’re right, Hijo. Because manuka honey benefits are so sought after and the honey so unique in taste, it’s often adulterated to cut costs or not even the real thing or real honey. We as consumers have a duty to ourselves to always get certified manuka honey (UMF, MGO, even KFactor). The price of the honey reflects its value, its unique properties and finding something cheaper should make sure wonder as to the quality and origin of the product. In my honest opinion, health is something you invest in and if you want real manuka honey, then you should get real manuka honey, even if it costs more than you’d like to invest in it. The next best alternative (if you don’t thing it’s worth it to invest in manuka honey or simply cannot afford it) is to get another honey variety, but still certified (raw, unadulterated, organic). There’s so much to choose from, from the delicately sweet (false) acacia honey to the stronger tasting chestnut honey, the thicker sunflower honey, the subtly aromatic thyme or lavender honeys to more unique ones such as asphodel, apple blossom, orange blossom, tree of heaven, strawberry tree or honeydew honey.

  4. UMF is the quality trade mark of the M─ünuka honey industry. Only M─ünuka honey produced and packed in New Zealand can carry the UMF mark. Only trust UMF or MGO. MGO has a direct correlation with UMF but many producers choose not to pay the license to use the UMF brand.
    K Factor is NOT a true indication of M─ünuka content. Kanuka is a different tree to M─ünuka and Kanuka does not offer the special properties Professor Peter Molan discovered in M─ünuka Honey. Kanuka and M─ünuka pollen are indistinguishable under the microscope, which is how pollen counts are conducted.
    K Factor is based purely on pollen count. If you see K Factor then read “This product is Kanuka honey”. Take this from a New Zealand beekeeper.

    • Thank you, Kevin. I really appreciate the information, especially coming from a specialist such as yourself. As a New Zealand beekeeper, you must be dealing with these particular honeys in day to day life. I honestly did not know the KFactor grading system for Manuka honey is actually for Kanuka honey. To my knowledge (and I have read all the official sources, studies and documents I could find), KFactor is just one of the grading systems used to grade Manuka honey, but one that measures pollen content, not the content of biologically active components with therapeutic properties like UMF and MGO.

      But since pollen is not the biologically active compound in Manuka honey (methylglyoxal is), not to mention it’s difficult to tell the difference between Kanuka and Manuka pollen in honey, the MGO and UMF grading systems are preferred to KFactor for grading Manuka honey, or more exactly, Manuka honey therapeutic potential. At the same time, KFactor seems like a good grading system to apply to both Kanuka and Manuka honey if what you are looking for is to find out pollen content. For therapeutic activity, UMF and MGO remain the gold standard. I’m wondering though, if Kanuka honey, being so closely related to Manuka, doesn’t share in its therapeutic properties and health benefits…

      I myself have only purchased MGO and UMF Manuka honey, as recommended by health officials, trusting that these two official grading systems are an indicator of quality, standardizing the therapeutic properties of the honey. Although I admit I’m curious if there are any noticeable differences in taste, color, texture and especially therapeutic properties between Manuka and Kanuka honey. I admit I am eager to see what studies uncover about Kanuka honey. Thank you again for your input and wishing you lots of health, Kevin!

Comments are closed.